Things to Know Regarding Tail Spend Management

by

Tail spend, a frequently disregarded aspect of an organization’s finances, refers to a multitude of minor purchases that are made below established procurement thresholds. Even though they may not seem like much, taken as a whole, these costs can account for a sizable amount of an organization’s yearly spending. In contrast to high-value procurement, managing tail spend poses distinct challenges because it is decentralized and there is a perceived disparity between effort and benefit. On the other hand, efficient tail spend management can result in significant cost savings, better financial transparency, and increased expense control. The idea, difficulties, and methods for optimizing tail spend in businesses are examined in this article.

The term tail spend can be defined as innumerable small purchases that an organization makes that are below its procurement standard. When done separately, they are not very noticeable, but when combined, they can lead to reasonable figures of expenditure being incurred. These categories of expenses usually fall under the category of tail spend; office supplies, marketing, IT accessories, research materials among others.

Thus, while every small purchase may go unnoticed, the total or aggregate of all these expenditures commonly known as tail spend may range from 10-20% of the company’s annual spending. If not monitored properly, such costs have a tendency of going for the worse. By tail spend management, the costs that are not captured through the procurement system are made visible and can be targeted for savings and channelled to better strategic organizational objectives.  

Having control over tail spend means recovering the buying that has been decentralized and which is now outside procurement’s domain. The first way is to accurately define what is considered tail spend through spend analysis and determining which items require mandatory approval, competitive bidding, and other solutions for controlling costs. It gives the visibility needed to address tail spend.

  • Challenges in Managing Tail Spend

Managing tail spend is actually different compared to managing high value procurement because they are not as significant in value as the latter. First, the small amount of money that is spent on each transaction does not justify the efforts that might be required from upper management to properly coordinate the tail spend. Moreover, undertaking the tasks of management controls over minor expenses appears to require more effort in comparison with the benefits received in terms of savings. 

Again, minor and infrequent purchases do not raise concern on the procurement radar since they are made by the employees in individual capacities and not as representatives of the organization. Often, these costs are hidden, and are significantly scalable just through volume, meaning that they can mushroom quickly. Furthermore, decentralized buying denies organizations the leeway to bargain through consolidation of purchasing for common products.

Last, but not the least; processing a large number of low-value, low-risk transactions is quite a strain for the organization as compared to the high risk, high value purchases. Adhering to all the procurement regulations such as seeking tenders becomes difficult if it is done across many small purchases. However, if organizations do not control out-of- control tails, they experience loss, uncontrolled buying, and cost savings are not achieved.

  • Strategies for Effective Tail Spend Management

It involves changing decentralised expenses to the procurement process since tail spend is a decentralised method of procuring products. There are various tactics that an organization can employ depending on the company’s total spend, available resources, and the objectives of the firm.

Policies including thresholds and the process for approval of low-value spending must be clearly outlined based on historical spending. To regain control and simplicity, tail spend may be redirected to preferred supplier agreements, ‘punch-out’ catalogues, purchase cards, or online portals. 

Centralizing buying enables companies to make large purchases, which in turn enables them to make large orders which attract a cheaper price. Commitments can aggregate the remaining consumption of various sectors of the business for improved prices through scale efficiencies. It also leads to volume purchase since people make standard purchases anchored on certain products.

  • The Role of Technology in Tail Spend Management

This makes it necessary to consider the role of technology as a key enabler to achieve scalable solutions to managing the tail spend. Companies are now using procure-to-pay solutions, ERP integration and other processes and tools to manage the tail spend.

Procurement tracking software allows for the automation of purchase-related processes that include requests, approvals, orders, and invoices of both strategic and operational spend. Other benefits of integration with accounting systems include real-time visibility over the amount spent in manufacturers’ direct and indirect costs or tail spend.

Technologies used in tail spend management include tools, which reduce the number of manual processes in an organization and give access to data. This makes it possible for organizations to manage large numbers of transactions in a cost-effective manner, while at the same time freeing up resources to other areas that might be more relevant to business success and growth.

  • Consequences of Optimising the Tail Spend 

Better management of tail spend is one of the ways through which organizations are able to gain cost savings and productivity. This strategy is used to enable organizations to order larger quantities of the same items while paying a lower unit price. Contract compliance also helps prevent maverick buying and spending leakage, which occurs when spending exceeds set guidelines and oversight.

Redirecting decentralized purchases helps to centralize control over expenses, and thus, finance gets authority to renegotiate contracts or to find other suppliers in case it is required. Such procurements can also help to reduce cases of duplicate procurements of the same products by different business units in an organization due to poor communication.

Conclusion

Tail spend management done right is essential for businesses looking to maximize their financial performance. Businesses can change how they handle small purchases by putting in place centralized procedures, utilizing technology, and encouraging a cost-conscious culture. Significant cost savings result from this, and it also improves financial control, transparency, and the ability to make strategic decisions.

Leave a Comment